Criticism of the National Health Service (England)
ethanedgley229 mengedit halaman ini 1 Minggu lalu


Criticism of the National Health Service (England) consists of issues such as gain access to, waiting lists, healthcare protection, and various scandals. The National Health Service (NHS) is the publicly funded healthcare system of England, created under the National Health Service Act 1946 by the post-war Labour federal government of Clement Attlee. It has come under much criticism, especially during the early 2000s, due to break outs of antibiotic resistant infections such as MRSA and Clostridioides difficile infection, waiting lists, and medical scandals such as the Alder Hey organs scandal. However, the involvement of the NHS in scandals extends back several years, consisting of over the provision of psychological health care in the 1970s and 1980s (eventually part of the reason for the Mental Health Act 1983), and overspends on healthcare facility newbuilds, including Guy's Hospital Phase III in London in 1985, the cost of which shot up from ₤ 29 million to ₤ 152 million. [1]
Access controls and waiting lists

In making health care a largely "unnoticeable cost" to the patient, healthcare appears to be successfully free to its customers - there is no specific NHS tax or levy. To decrease expenses and make sure that everybody is dealt with equitably, there are a range of "gatekeepers." The family doctor (GP) works as a primary gatekeeper - without a referral from a GP, it is frequently impossible to gain greater courses of treatment, such as an appointment with a consultant. These are argued to be required - Welshman Bevan kept in mind in a 1948 speech in your home of Commons, "we will never ever have all we require ... expectations will constantly exceed capacity". [2] On the other hand, the nationwide medical insurance systems in other countries (e.g. Germany) have ignored the need for recommendation